Background & Aims

Acute orthopedic traumatic injuries are prevalent and costly. 20-50% of patients develop persistent pain and disability despite making good physical recovery, a significant public health burden. Psychosocial factors predict recovery after injury, yet to date there are no efficacious interventions for this population. We used a sequential approach to develop the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (TOR), a program aimed at preventing persistent pain and disability after an acute orthopedic traumatic injury. We demonstrated TOR’s feasibility at one site10. We problem solved barriers to recruitment and surgeon referrals11 by conducting focus groups with 79 providers across 3 trauma centers, developing education materials and integrating our protocol within clinical care.
This is a multi-site RCT of TOR versus control. We aim to meet a priori set feasibility benchmarks and demonstrate that TOR leads to improvement in pain, physical/emotional function and other relevant outcome.

Methods

Surgeons provided warm hand-offs. Adults with an acute orthopedic traumatic injury 1-2 months earlier who endorses pain catastrophizing (PCS> 20) or pain anxiety (PASS-20> 40) were eligible, completed baseline and were randomized 1:1 to TOR or MEUC stratified by site. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA; physical function), Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CES-D), The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist and putative mechanisms (PCS, PASS-20, mindfulness CAMS and coping MOCS ) were administered at baseline, post treatment and 3 months later. TOR is a 4-session live video–based, program. TOR teaches skills through didactics, in-session activities, and home practice. MEUC is an educational pamphlet. We calculated feasibility of recruitment and data collection, credibility, acceptability, satisfaction, adherence and fidelity. For efficacy analysis, we implemented a shared baseline linear mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

195 patients were eligible and randomized (97 to TOR, 98 to MEUC). We achieved or exceeded our predefined benchmarks for primary outcomes (89% feasibility of recruitment; 78% appropriateness; 79% survey completion rate; 99% TOR satisfaction; 73% acceptability of TOR, 100% fidelity). Data collection from staff was successful, and staff scored above the expected cutoff on question items related to satisfaction (75%), ease of referral (100%), patient cost-benefit (79%), clinic cost-benefit (72%), feasibility of implementation (79%), and appropriateness (88%). Referral rate was 89%. Participation in TOR, compared to MEUC, was associated with statistically significant improvement baseline to post-intervention in physical function (-7.34; P?

Conclusions

We met or exceeded all patient and staff feasibility benchmarks across the 4 sites. For patients, we observed excellent feasibility (ability to recruit participants quickly, randomize and retain them with low attrition rates). Most participants completed all study measures across the 3 timepoints, and those in TOR believed that the program would help improve their recovery trajectory and experienced high satisfaction with the program. For staff, we observed excellent feasibility of referrals, implementation, data collection, satisfaction, and ease of the study procedures and referral process. Taken together, these findings suggest that TOR content and methodology is appropriate for both patients and orthopedic trauma staff.
Efficacy results shows that TOR can improve physical function, pain, depression, and PTSD, and can prevent transition from acute to persistent pain. TOR has the potential to be the first efficacious program with smooth integration within orthopedic trauma clinics

References

1.Morris S, Lenihan B, Duddy L, O’Sullivan M. Outcome after Musculoskeletal Trauma Treated in a Regional Hospital. J Trauma. 2000;49(3):461. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200009000-00013
2.Proctor TJ, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD. Unremitting health-care-utilization outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation of patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(1):62-69. doi:10.2106/00004623-200401000-00011
3.Baldwin ML. Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):33-41. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.013
4.Busse JW, Heels-Ansdell D, Makosso-Kallyth S, et al. Patient coping and expectations predict recovery after major orthopaedic trauma. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(1):51-59. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.021
5.Clay FJ, Newstead SV, Watson WL, Ozanne-Smith J, Guy J, McClure RJ. Bio-Psychosocial Determinants of Persistent Pain 6 Months After Non-Life-Threatening Acute Orthopaedic Trauma. J Pain. 2010;11(5):420-430. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.12.002
6.Helmerhorst GTT, Vranceanu AM, Vrahas M, Smith M, Ring D. Risk factors for continued opioid use one to two months after surgery for musculoskeletal trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(6):495-499. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01406
7.Vranceanu AM, Barsky A, Ring D. Psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):2014-2018. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01512
8.Van Wyngaarden JJ, Archer KR, Pennings JS, Matuszewski PE, Noehren B. Psychosocial Predictors of Chronic Pain 12 Months After Surgical Fixation for Lower Extremity Fracture: A Prospective Study. Phys Ther. 2022;102(10):pzac101. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzac101
9.Van Wyngaarden JJ, Archer KR, Spencer A, et al. Early Pain Catastrophizing Exacerbates Impaired Limb Loading and 6-Minute Walk Test Distance 12 Months After Lower Extremity Fracture. Phys Ther. 2021;101(11):pzab194. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzab194
10.Vranceanu AM, Jacobs C, Lin A, et al. Results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery (TOR): a live video program to prevent chronic pain in at-risk adults with orthopedic injuries. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):30. doi:10.1186/s40814-019-0416-7
11.Vranceanu AM, Beks RB, Guitton TG, Janssen SJ, Ring D. How do Orthopaedic Surgeons Address Psychological Aspects of Illness? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017;5(1):2-9. PMCID: PMC5339350
12.Bakhshaie J, Fishbein NS, Woodworth E, et al. Health disparities in orthopedic trauma: a qualitative study examining providers’ perspectives on barriers to care and recovery outcomes. Soc Work Health Care. 2023;62(6-7):207-227. doi:10.1080/00981389.2023.2205909
13.Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
14.Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. JAMA. 2022;328(22):2252-2264. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.21022
15.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
16.Salaffi F, Stancati A, Alberto Silvestri C, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(4):283-291. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004
17.Farrar JT, Troxel AB, Stott C, Duncombe P, Jensen MP. Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0—10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2008;30(5):974-985. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.011
18.Duarte BA, Mace RA, Doorley JD, Penn TM, Bakhshaie J, Vranceanu AM. Breaking the Disability Spiral: A Case Series Report Illustrating the Delivery of a Brief Skills Based Coaching Intervention to Prevent Chronic Dysfunction and Pain After Orthopedic Injury. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. Published online May 30, 2023. doi:10.1007/s10880-023-09959-z
19.Williams N. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire. Occup Med. 2016;66(9):757. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqw140
20.McCreary DL, Cunningham BP. Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: What Change Matters in Ankle Fractures. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021;14(6):496-500. doi:10.1177/1938640020923262
21.Sandvall B, Okoroafor UC, Gerull W, Guattery J, Calfee RP. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures. J Hand Surg. 2019;44(6):454-459.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.015
22.Sepehri A, Sleat GKJ, Roffey DM, et al. Responsiveness of the PROMIS physical function measure in orthopaedic trauma patients. Injury. 2022;53(6):2041-2046. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.017
23.Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385-401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
24.Rodriguez-Leal FA, Haase R, Akgün K, et al. Nonwalking response to fampridine in patients with multiple sclerosis in a real-world setting. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2019;10:2040622319835136. doi:10.1177/2040622319835136
25.Weathers F, Litz B, Herman D, Huska J, Keane T. The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. National Center for PTSD. Accessed November 28, 2023. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp
26.Bovin MJ, Marx BP, Weathers FW, et al. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(11):1379-1391. doi:10.1037/pas0000254
27.Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(4):524. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524
28.McCracken L, Dhingra L. A short version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity. Pain Res Manag. 2002;7(1). doi:10.1155/2002/517163
29.Darnall BD, Sturgeon JA, Kao MC, Hah JM, Mackey SC. From Catastrophizing to Recovery: a pilot study of a single-session treatment for pain catastrophizing. J Pain Res. 2014;7:219-226. doi:10.2147/JPR.S62329
30.Abrams MP, Carleton RN, Asmundson GJG. An exploration of the psychometric properties of the PASS-20 with a nonclinical sample. J Pain. 2007;8(11):879-886. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.06.004
31.Minetama M, Kawakami M, Teraguchi M, et al. Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(7):964-975. doi:10.1177/0269215520986688
32.Feldman G, Hayes A, Kumar S, Greeson J, Laurenceau JP. Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: The Development and Initial Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2007;29(3):177-190. doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8
33.Carver C. Measure of Current Status. Published 2006. Accessed November 28, 2023. https://local.psy.miami.edu/faculty/ccarver/sclMOCS.phtml
34.Consortium (METRC) TMETR. Early Effects of the Trauma Collaborative Care Intervention: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Cluster Clinical Trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(11):538. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001581
35.Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC). The 12-Month Effects of the Trauma Collaborative Care Intervention: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(20):1796-1804. doi:10.2106/JBJS.22.00475
36.Aaron R, Rassu F, Wegener S, Holley A, Castillo R, Fisher E. Psychological Therapies for the Management of Pain Following Musculoskeletal Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(12):e196. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.969

Presenting Author

Ana-Maria Vranceanu

Poster Authors

Ana-Maria Vranceanu

PhD

Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School

Lead Author

Topics

  • Treatment/Management: Pharmacology: Psychological and Rehabilitative Therapies