Background & Aims
Background: Chronic pelvic pain is a common condition affecting between 4% and 10% of women of reproductive age, equivalent to approximately 5 million women worldwide. The determinants of the condition’s development are not clearly defined, likely representing a complex interaction of various factors. However, literature has consistently demonstrated a significant association between the disease and prior exposure to abdominal surgeries. Cesarean section stands out due to its frequency, particularly in certain countries such as Brazil, and its global prevalence. Objectives: Our aims were to infer the cumulative incidence of chronic pelvic pain in women 12-24 months postpartum, identify factors associated with its occurrence, and investigate the potential cause-and-effect relationship of cesarean section in the process.
Methods
Methods: A cross-sectional study nested in the Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Birth Cohort Studies (BRISA) cohort was conducted in two Brazilian municipalities in 2010-2011. A convenience sample of 2,847 pregnant women at 22-25 weeks of gestation was included. Among 2,750 women interviewed during prenatal, 2,160 women without pelvic pain before pregnancy and birth were included. Agglomerative clustering identified homogeneous subgroups, and a Random Forest classifier determined feature importance. Multinomial logit regression models were constructed to assess variable associations with the outcome, using augmented backward elimination. To test the causal assumption (cesarean section as exposure and pelvic pain as outcome), a counterfactual approach was employed. Common causes were identified through a directed acyclic graph, and causal effects were estimated using backdoor propensity score-based inverse weighting. Assumption validity was tested through robustness checks.
Results
Results: The cumulative incidence of pelvic pain was 12.7% in 24 months postpartum. Two distinct clusters were identified, with one characterized by more symptoms of depression, anxiety, and a less supportive network, leading to earlier pelvic pain development. Cesarean section was strongly associated with chronic pelvic pain in both clusters (OR=1.72|2.08, p<.001|p=.003). Perception of discrimination (OR=1.52|1.84, p<.030|p=.002) and geographic region (OR=1.53|1.54, p<.035|p=.048) were also positively associated with increased risk. Conversely, delivery satisfaction (OR=0.53, p<.006) and breastfeeding (OR=0.61, p<.018) appeared to be associated with a lower risk, even that in specific subgroups. Causal estimation indicated a 5.8% increased probability of developing chronic pelvic pain after cesarean section compared to other deliveries.
Conclusions
Conclusions: The cumulative incidence of pelvic pain postpartum is high and directly associated with the mode of delivery, with cesarean section increasing this risk. Perception of discrimination and local geographic factors independently contribute to an increased risk, while delivery satisfaction and breastfeeding seem to have a protective effect. Our data support a significant causal effect of cesarean section on the development of postpartum pelvic pain.
References
ACOG. 2020. “Chronic Pelvic Pain.” Obstetrics & Gynecology 135 (3): e98–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003716.
Ahangari, Alebtekin. 2014. “Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain among Women: An Updated Review.” Pain Physician 17 (2): E141-7.
Almeida, E. C. S., A. A. Nogueira, F. J. Candido dos Reis, and J. C. Rosa e Silva. 2002. “Cesarean Section as a Cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain.” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 79 (2): 101–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00227-8.
Ayorinde, A. A., S. Bhattacharya, K. L. Druce, G. T. Jones, and G. J. Macfarlane. 2017. “Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women of Reproductive and Post-Reproductive Age: A Population-Based Study.” European Journal of Pain (London, England) 21 (3): 445–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.938.
Betrán, Ana Pilar, Jianfeng Ye, Anne-Beth Moller, Jun Zhang, A. Metin Gülmezoglu, and Maria Regina Torloni. 2016. “The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.” PLoS ONE 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
Blomquist, Joan L., Kelly Mcdermott, and Victoria L. Handa. 2014. “Pelvic Pain and Mode of Delivery.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 210 (5): 423.e1-423.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.032.
Caumo, Wolnei, Luciana C. Antunes, Jéssica Lorenzzi Elkfury, Evelyn G. Herbstrith, Raquel Busanello Sipmann, Andressa Souza, Iraci Ls Torres, Vinicius Souza Dos Santos, and Randy Neblett. 2017. “The Central Sensitization Inventory Validated and Adapted for a Brazilian Population: Psychometric Properties and Its Relationship with Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor.” Journal of Pain Research 10: 2109–22. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S131479.
Chen, Innie, Kednapa Thavorn, Minxue Shen, Yvette Goddard, Paul Yong, George S. MacRae, Corrine Nishi, Ayah Matar, and Catherine Allaire. 2017. “Hospital-Associated Costs of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Canada: A Population-Based Descriptive Study.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 39 (3): 174–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.008.
Coelho, L. S. C., L. M. O. Brito, M. B. C. Chein, T. S. Mascarenhas, J. P. L. Costa, A. A. Nogueira, and O. B. Poli-Neto. 2014. “Prevalence and Conditions Associated with Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women from São Luís, Brazil.” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 47 (9): 818–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20143710.
Dydyk, Alexander M., and Amy Givler. 2021. “Central Pain Syndrome.” In StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553027/.
Ehlert, Ulrike, C. Heim, and D. H. Hellhammer. 1999. “Chronic Pelvic Pain as a Somatoform Disorder.” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 68 (2): 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000012318.
Honaker, James, Gary King, and Matthew Blackwell. 2011. “Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data.” Journal of Statistical Software 45 (7). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i07.
Hooker, A. B., B. R. van Moorst, E. P. van Haarst, N. A. van Ootegehem, D. K. van Dijken, and M. H. Heres. 2013. “Chronic Pelvic Pain: Evaluation of the Epidemiology, Baseline Demographics, and Clinical Variables via a Prospective and Multidisciplinary Approach.” Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 40 (4): 492–98.
Ji, Ru-Rong, Andrea Nackley, Yul Huh, Niccolò Terrando, and William Maixner. 2018. “Neuroinflammation and Central Sensitization in Chronic and Widespread Pain.” Anesthesiology 129 (2): 343–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002130.
Kainu, J. Petter, Erja Halmesmäki, Kari T. Korttila, and P. Johanna Sarvela. 2016. “Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery and Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Anesthesia and Analgesia 123 (6): 1535–45. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001619.
Latthe, Pallavi, Manish Latthe, Lale Say, Metin Gülmezoglu, and Khalid S Khan. 2006. “WHO Systematic Review of Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Neglected Reproductive Health Morbidity.” BMC Public Health 6 (1): 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-177.
Latthe, Pallavi, Luciano Mignini, Richard Gray, Robert Hills, and Khalid Khan. 2006. “Factors Predisposing Women to Chronic Pelvic Pain: Systematic Review.” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 332 (7544): 749–55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38748.697465.55.
Levesque, Amélie, Thibault Riant, Stéphane Ploteau, Jerôme Rigaud, and Jean Jacques Labat. 2018. “Clinical Criteria of Central Sensitization in Chronic Pelvic and Perineal Pain (Convergences PP Criteria): Elaboration of a Clinical Evaluation Tool Based on Formal Expert Consensus.” Pain Medicine (United States) 19 (10): 2009–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny030.
Loos, Maarten J., Marc R. Scheltinga, Leon G. Mulders, and Rudi M. Roumen. 2008. “The Pfannenstiel Incision as a Source of Chronic Pain.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 111 (4): 839–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a4efa.
Mathias, S D, M Kuppermann, R F Liberman, R C Lipschutz, and J F Steege. 1996. “Chronic Pelvic Pain: Prevalence, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Economic Correlates.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 87 (3): 321–27.
Nnoaham, Kelechi E., Lone Hummelshoj, Premila Webster, Thomas D’Hooghe, Fiorenzo de Cicco Nardone, Carlo de Cicco Nardone, Crispin Jenkinson, Stephen H. Kennedy, Krina T. Zondervan, and World Endometriosis Research Foundation Global Study of Women’s Health consortium. 2011. “Impact of Endometriosis on Quality of Life and Work Productivity: A Multicenter Study across Ten Countries.” Fertility and Sterility 96 (2): 366-373.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090.
Ribeiro, V. S., F. P. Figueiredo, A. a. M. Silva, H. Bettiol, R. F. L. Batista, L. C. Coimbra, Z. C. Lamy, and M. A. Barbieri. 2007. “Why Are the Rates of Cesarean Section in Brazil Higher in More Developed Cities than in Less Developed Ones?” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research = Revista Brasileira De Pesquisas Medicas E Biologicas 40 (9): 1211–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879×2006005000130.
Sharp, Howard T., Julia V. Johnson, Lauren A. Lemieux, and Sean M. Currigan. 2017. “Executive Summary of the ReVITALize Initiative: Standardizing Gynecologic Data Definitions.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 129 (4): 603–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001939.
Silva, Antônio Augusto Moura da, Vanda Maria Ferreira Simões, Marco Antonio Barbieri, Viviane Cunha Cardoso, Claudia Maria Coelho Alves, Erika Bárbara Abreu Fonseca Thomaz, Rejane Christine de Sousa Queiroz, Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli, Rosângela Fernandes Lucena Batista, and Heloísa Bettiol. 2014. “A Protocol to Identify Non-Classical Risk Factors for Preterm Births: The Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Prenatal Cohort (BRISA).” Reproductive Health 11 (November). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-79.
Silva, Gabriela Pagano de Oliveira Goncalves da, Anderson Luís do Nascimento, Daniela Michelazzo, Fernando Filardi Alves Junior, Marcelo Gondim M.G. Rocha, Júlio César Rosa E Silva, Francisco José Candido Dos Reis, et al. 2011. “High Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil and Direct Association with Abdominal Surgery.” Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 66 (8): 1307–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000800001.
Stavseth, Marianne Riksheim, Thomas Clausen, and Jo Røislien. 2019. “How Handling Missing Data May Impact Conclusions: A Comparison of Six Different Imputation Methods for Categorical Questionnaire Data.” SAGE Open Medicine 7 (January). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822912.
Stones, R. W., and C. Price. 2002. Health Services for Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. Vol. 95. 11. Royal Society of Medicine Press. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.95.11.531.
Tripoli, Tatiana M, Hélio Sato, Marair G Sartori, Fábio Fernando de Araujo, Manoel J B C Girão, and Eduardo Schor. 2011. “Evaluation of Quality of Life and Sexual Satisfaction in Women Suffering from Chronic Pelvic Pain with or without Endometriosis.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 8 (2): 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01976.x.
Warren, John W, Vadim Morozov, and Fred M Howard. 2011. “Could Chronic Pelvic Pain Be a Functional Somatic Syndrome?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 205 (3): 199.e1—-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.003.
Zondervan, K. T., P. L. Yudkin, M. P. Vessey, C. P. Jenkinson, M. G. Dawes, D. H. Barlow, and S. H. Kennedy. 2001. “The Community Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women and Associated Illness Behaviour.” British Journal of General Practice 51 (468): 541–47.
Presenting Author
Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto
Poster Authors
Omero Poli-Neto
PhD
Ribeirao Preto Medical School of University of Sao Paulo
Lead Author
Lia Shimamura
Lead Author
Heloisa Bettiol
Lead Author
Antonio Silva
Lead Author
Antonio Nogueira
Lead Author
Marco Barbieri
Lead Author
Julio Rosa-e-Silva
Lead Author
Topics
- Epidemiology